Maven android plugin, “–core-library” option not quite working

I’ve recently been working on building some android based applications now for the passed 3 or so months, and its been a fantastic journey so far. However, there have been times where I’ve found I talk to myself quite a bit, and for most part, I find myself muttering “what the heck is that supposed to mean?!”

This was one such occasion. I use maven for building my android project, but I had recently started using Springs RestTemplate, and there were a few libraries that I had to import while attempting to build REST based communications.

One thing that caught me off-guard, was, that when I came to build the project, I was now presented with a number of errors, all with the same sort of warning which read as:

[INFO] [android:dex {execution: default-dex}]
[INFO] C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_20\jre\bin\java [-jar, C:\Program Files (x86)\Android\android-sdk-windows\platform-tools\lib\dx.jar, –dex, –output=C:\dev\android-sample\target\classes.dex, C:\dev\android-sample\target\android-classes]
[INFO]
[INFO] trouble processing “javax/xml/bind/annotation/adapters/CollapsedStringAdapter.class”:
[INFO]
[INFO] Ill-advised or mistaken usage of a core class (java.* or javax.*)
[INFO] when not building a core library.
[INFO]
[INFO] This is often due to inadvertently including a core library file
[INFO] in your application’s project, when using an IDE (such as
[INFO] Eclipse). If you are sure you’re not intentionally defining a
[INFO] core class, then this is the most likely explanation of what’s
[INFO] going on.
[INFO]
[INFO] However, you might actually be trying to define a class in a core
[INFO] namespace, the source of which you may have taken, for example,
[INFO] from a non-Android virtual machine project. This will most
[INFO] assuredly not work. At a minimum, it jeopardizes the
[INFO] compatibility of your app with future versions of the platform.
[INFO] It is also often of questionable legality.
[INFO]
[INFO] If you really intend to build a core library — which is only
[INFO] appropriate as part of creating a full virtual machine
[INFO] distribution, as opposed to compiling an application — then use
[INFO] the “–core-library” option to suppress this error message.
[INFO]
[INFO] If you go ahead and use “–core-library” but are in fact
[INFO] building an application, then be forewarned that your application
[INFO] will still fail to build or run, at some point. Please be
[INFO] prepared for angry customers who find, for example, that your
[INFO] application ceases to function once they upgrade their operating
[INFO] system. You will be to blame for this problem.
[INFO]
[INFO] If you are legitimately using some code that happens to be in a
[INFO] core package, then the easiest safe alternative you have is to
[INFO] repackage that code. That is, move the classes in question into
[INFO] your own package namespace. This means that they will never be in
[INFO] conflict with core system classes. JarJar is a tool that may help
[INFO] you in this endeavor. If you find that you cannot do this, then
[INFO] that is an indication that the path you are on will ultimately
[INFO] lead to pain, suffering, grief, and lamentation.
[INFO]
[INFO] 1 error; aborting
[INFO] ————————————————————————
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ————————————————————————
[INFO]

Now that’s a pretty scary error to have, and on subsequent investigation, it seems like some marshalling libraries I’ve imported have the same namespace as some included java namespaces. Not to worry, I trust that the developers of this marshalling library know what they’re doing, so I just want it to build. But alas, following the instructions to use the –core-library option, the maven-android-plugin still refuses to build, and you just get back the same build error message.

I then found this nice bug report, which detailed pretty much everything I was experiencing – thank you to whoever you might be! So I thought the least I could do was fix the bug, if it was so well logged!

It turns out that the maven-android-plugin had a small bug in it, where the order of the options weren’t quite 100%. The GitHub pull request is here, and it has been accepted, so I assume it will be available in the next release.

I hope this helps anyone else out there experiencing this problem.

Advertisements